For best experience please turn on javascript and use a modern browser!

Working Papers Series

Centre for Urban Studies

The Working Paper Series (WPS) allows for timely and wide dissemination of research findings and provides our researchers with the possibility to get early feedback on their work.

Papers published in the series are pre-publications, published electronically by the Centre for Urban Studies and available online-only via this website. Upon publication, the downloadable CUS WPS version will be removed from our website, and the download link is replaced by a direct link to the publisher's website. 

Announcements of new working papers are circulated in our newsletter

Results: 1 - 30 of 55
Results: 1 - 30 of 55
  • WPS No.55 | Howard, A., Hochstenbach, C. & Ronald, R. (2021) | Rental sector liberalization and the housing outcomes for young urban adults

    This paper explores the drivers and housing outcomes of rental sector liberalization in Amsterdam for young adults. It looks at differences between socio-economic and demographic groups, as well as how young adults compare to older generations.

  • WPS No.54 | Hellmer, E., Lin, Y. & Lu, P. (2021) | Reinventing invited spaces of citizenship through transgressive participation: Taipei’s ‘Parks for Children by Children’ movement

    From angry mothers to professional advocacy for play street movement in Taipei: the PFC, a group of female citizens enacted their insurgency to navigate through technocrat dominated planning system for children's right to the city street. This paper seeks to address the question of how to employ an insurgent planner, or how to incorporate insurgent planning tactics and insurgent actors into mainstream planning practices.

  • WPS No.53 | Nikolaeva, A. (2021) | Smarter cities, smarter bicycles? Exploring the relationship between smart city visions and cycling in Copenhagen and Amsterdam

    Smart city projects are criticized by scholars for pro-innovation bias and technological solutionism. Building on these critiques, this working paper by Anna Nikolaeva investigates the drivers of “smartification” of cycling in the cities of Copenhagen and Amsterdam.

  • WPS No.52 | Nikolaeva, A., Lin, Y., Nello-Deakin, S., Rubin, O. & von Schönfeld, K.C. (2021) | What does it mean to be less mobile? Insights from COVID-19 lockdown

    What can we learn about the role of mobility in daily life from the lockdown? This new paper offers insight into individual experiences of reduced mobility under COVID-19.

  • WPS No.51 | Van der Star, M. & Hochstenbach, C. (2021) | Levels, predictors and meanings of place attachment among Norwegian and Dutch stayers in rural shrinking regions

    In this working paper, Marieke van der Star and Cody Hochstenbach explore place attachment among rural stayers in two shrinking regions in Norway and the Netherlands. Their study reveals high levels of place attachment and stayers construct images of living in a rural idyll where a sense of normalcy, familiarity and natural quality is maintained.

  • WPS No.50 | Hochstenbach, C. (2021) | Private landlordism, class and social inequality

    In this working paper, Cody Hochstenbach finds that a substantial portion of landlords can be found in top income, wealth and neighbourhood positions. One-third of the top wealth percentile – the Dutch top 1% - consists out of landlords, underscoring their economic power.

  • WPS No.49 | Bosma, J.R. (2021) | Platformed professionalization

    This paper analyses processes of professionalization on Airbnb in Berlin, exploring who is able to take part successfully in urban value creation processes facilitated by short-term rental platforms. In doing so, it intervenes in debates on platform urbanism that focus on the role of digital platforms in reconfiguring urban governance and livelihoods.

  • WPS No.48 | Bronsvoort, I. & Uitermark, J. (2020) | From Instagram posts to Eastside clothes

    In this working paper, Irene Bronsvoort and Justus Uitermark use their detailed case study of a shopping street to show how social media are implicated in gentrification.

  • WPS No.47 | Zorlu, A. & Van Gent, W. (2020) | Economic Assimilation of the “Third Generation”

    In this working paper, Aslan Zorlu and Wouter van Gent find that the emerging third generation, the grandchildren of immigrants, appear to compensate their parental income gap.

  • WPS No.46 | Van Gent, W. & Zorlu, A. (2020) | Housing market position and spatial concentration of immigrants and their (grand)children

    To gauge socio-spatial assimilation in the Netherlands, Wouter van Gent and Aslan Zorlu study the housing market position and concentration of immigrants and their families from a generational perspective.

  • WPS No.45 | Glaser, M. & Krizek, K.J. (2020) | Can emergency response measures trigger a transition to new transport systems? Exploring the role of “street experiments” from 55 US cities

    In this working paper, Meredith Glaser and Kevin J. Krizek inventory and assess street-level COVID-response measures from 55 US cities to explore characteristics of “street experiments” that might enable a transition to an alternative mobility future.

  • WPS No.44 | Hochstenbach, C. & Arundel, R. (2020) | Unravelling the unequal geography of declining young adult homeownership in the Netherlands

    In this working paper, Cody Hochstenbach and Rowan Arundel analyze declining young adult homeownership rates across the Netherlands, and their geography.

  • WPS No.43 | Doling, J. & Arundel, R. (2020) | The Home as Workplace

    This working paper by John Doling and Rowan Arundel explores the resurgence in western countries of the use of the home as a place of work

  • WPS No.42 | Druta, O. & Ronald, R. (2019) | (Re)inventing single living: Tokyo share houses as commodified, individualized sharing

    In context of increasing housing market pressures and an international swell in the formation of non-family households, especially among younger-adults, this paper examines share house (shea-hausu), an increasingly popular form of private rental housing in Tokyo.

  • WPS No.41 | Törnberg, P. (2019) | Dark Disneyfication: Staging Authenticity on Airbnb

    Urban areas around the world are currently seeing a surge in tourists on the hunt for “real urban experiences”: off-the-beaten-track, everyday and mundane urban life, seen as representing something “real” and “authentic” – with New York City, and in particular Brooklyn, providing the most emblematic example of these trends. This taste for urban authenticity has linked up with the simultaneous rise of urban digital platforms, as short-term rental platforms like Airbnb effectively cater to this form of tourism by providing access to residential homes in areas outside of urban centers, adding a sense of being integrated in the everyday urban fabric.

  • WPS No.40 | Törnberg, P. & Chiappini, L. (2019) | Selling black places on Airbnb: Colonial discourse and the marketing of black communities in New York City

    Airbnb has recently become a growing topic of both concern and interest for urban researchers, policymakers, and activists. Previous research has emphasized Airbnb’s economic impact and as a driver of residential gentrification, but Airbnb also fosters place entrepreneurs, geared to extract value from a global symbolic economy by marketing the urban frontier to a transnational middle-class.

  • WPS No.39 | Boy, J.D. & Uitermark, J. (2019) |Lifestyle enclaves in the Instagram city?

    Echo chambers and filter bubbles are becoming part of a new master narrative about social media. Commentators and scholars worry that, since social media enable assortative social ties among those who share a common identity, they fortify identity-based divisions and drive polarization.

  • WPS No.38 | Pinkster, F.M., Ferier, M. and M. Hoekstra (2019) | On the stickiness of territorial stigma: diverging experiences in Amsterdam’s most notorious neighbourhood

    In Western Europe, a select number of “ghettos” are at the forefront of public anxieties about urban inequality and failed integration. These notorious neighbourhoods at the bottom of the moral spatial order, are imagined as different and disconnected from the rest of the city. This paper examines how residents in Amsterdam Bijlmer, a peripheral social housing estate that has long been portrayed as the Dutch ghetto, experience the symbolic denigration of their neighbourhood.

  • WPS No.37 | Hochstenbach, C. & S. Musterd (2019) | The suburbanization, segregation and changing geography of different forms of poverty in Dutch metropolitan regions

    Recent urban studies show increasing interest in the segregation and changing geography of poor households across European and North American cities. However, these studies tend to rely on relatively crude categorizations of poor populations, despite potentially important variation within groups. This paper therefore seeks to deepen our understanding of the segregation by focusing on different types of low-income households, and their (changing) geography.

  • WPS No.36 | Hochstenbach, C. & R. Arundel (2019) | Spatial housing-market polarization: diverging house values in the Netherlands

    Housing is central in the reproduction of social inequalities. Beyond divides across populations, trends point to intensifying polarization in housing-market dynamics across space. Nonetheless, little systematic evidence exists on the spatial inequality of housing values. In this paper, Cody Hochstenbach and Rowan Arundel address this through a detailed investigation of house-value developments in the Netherlands over time and space.

  • WPS No.35 | Pilo', F. (2019) | Material politics: utility documents, claims-making and construction of the ‘deserving citizen’ in Rio de Janeiro

    Through an ethnographic study of a document in urban Brazil - the electricity bill - this working paper by Francesca Pilo' argues for developing a relational and materialist approach to citizenship.

  • WPS No.34 | Hochstenbach, C. & Ronald, R. (2018) | The revival of the private rental sector under Amsterdam’s regulated marketization regime

    This working paper by Cody Hochstenbach and Richard Ronald explores how and why the state-orchestrated revival of the private rental sector in Amsterdam has come about, highlighting how new growth in free market private renting is related to the restructuring of the urban housing market around owner-occupation since the 1990s. More critically, the analysis asserts that the restructuring of Amsterdam’s housing stock can be conceptualized as regulated marketization.

  • WPS No.33 | Zandbergen, D. (2018) | The making of a responsive city

    This Working Paper explores the material politics of the “responsive city.” This politics imbues urban objects that are made “smart” with responsive sensors, with the capacity to negotiate the multitude of interests that make up contemporary urban life in a frictionless way.

  • WPS No.32 | Arundel, R. and Hochstenbach, C. (2018) | The spatial polarization of housing markets and wealth accumulation

    This paper answers the question how where one buys housing has gained crucial importance in structuring future housing-wealth accumulation with highly uneven access to high-gain areas.

  • WPS No.31 | Hochstenbach, C., van Gent, W., Musterd, S. (2018) | Shifting regional dynamics of life course

    This paper investigates key transitions in household formation and dissolution in the Amsterdam region before, during and after the housing crisis of 2008. In contrast to expectations, mobility-related life-course transitions have not been affected by the crisis. Mobility rates among ‘stable’ households do show a decline though. However, changes appear between rental and ownership markets, as well as changes in the geography of life-course transitions.

  • WPS No.30 | Tzaninis, Y., Boterman, W. and Pratsinakis, M. (2018) | Right-wing populism and xenophobia

    This paper challenges the idea that there is currently a geographical, political dichotomy between cities and the periphery: the city is supposed to represent the tolerant vote while the periphery is portrayed as more prone to populism and xenophobia.

  • WPS No.29 | Hochstenbach, C. (2018) | The age dimensions of urban change and socio-spatial inequality

    Age is not very often explicitly integrated into analyses of urban socio-spatial inequality. This working paper by Cody Hochstenbach makes an effort to do so, and shows how this helps us understand how gentrification progresses over time, takes on new forms and expands into areas previously left untouched.

  • WPS No.28 | Jaffe, R. (2018) | Security Aesthetics and Political Community Formation in Urban Jamaica

    How do political powers mobilize aesthetic means to simultaneously produce a sense of security and a sense of community? Drawing on research in Kingston, Jamaica, this paper by Rivke Jaffe connects philosophical work on the politics of aesthetics to considerations of spatiality and materiality, in order to develop a political geography of sensation.

  • WPS No.27 | van Gent, W.P.C. and Boterman, W.R. (2018)| Gentrification of the changing state

    Rather than seeing class dynamics as subservient to capital, the authors contend that class relations may feed into state dynamics in two related ways: representative politics and State hegemonies. Taking Jason Hackworth and Neil Smith’s seminal paper on the ‘changing state of gentrification’ as a starting point, this paper argues to reconceptualise state-led gentrification to advance our understanding of urban transformation.

  • WPS No.26 | Nikolaeva, A. et al. (2017)| A new politics of mobility: Commoning movement, meaning and practice in Amsterdam and Santiago

    Transitions to more sustainable and just mobilities require moving beyond technocentrism and rethinking the very meaning of mobility in cities and societies. This working paper by CUS member Anna Nikolaeva and colleagues demonstrates that such rethinking is inherently political and requires engagement with wider debates on the politics of transitions.